Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
9-27-2018
Case Synopsis
The Court held that the district court acted within its discretion in sanctioning the party for discovery violations. Further, it determined that the district court’s citation to the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct causes reputational harm that amounts to a sanction and that the district court correctly found that the attorneys did in fact violate Nevada Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3(a)(1).
Recommended Citation
Stafford, Amanda, "Valley Health Sys. v. Estate of Jane Doe, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 76 (Sept. 27, 2018) (en banc)" (2018). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1195.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1195