Authors

Riley Coggins

Document Type

Case Summary

Publication Date

Winter 1-2020

Case Synopsis

The Court held that evidentiary hearings are appropriate on fair-cross-section challenges when the defendant makes specific allegations that, if true, would be sufficient to constitute a prima facie violation of the state’s fair-cross-section requirement. The Court also briefly discussed appellant’s claims of insufficient evidence and prosecutorial misconduct regarding DNA evidence. The Court found that neither claim warranted a new trial.

Included in

Evidence Commons

Share

COinS