Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
Winter 1-2020
Case Synopsis
The Court affirmed a pretrial motion to dismiss of an indictment after it determined that the State failed to rebut the presumption of prejudice after an analysis under the Barker-Doggett factors. The Court afforded “the only possible remedy” after it was found that a 26 month delay resulted from the State’s gross negligence and the delay was prejudicial to Inzunza.
Recommended Citation
Gonzalez, Christopher, "Nevada v. Inzunza, 135 Nev. Adv. Op. 69 (Dec. 26, 2019)" (2020). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1277.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1277