The Court affirmed a pretrial motion to dismiss of an indictment after it determined that the State failed to rebut the presumption of prejudice after an analysis under the Barker-Doggett factors. The Court afforded “the only possible remedy” after it was found that a 26 month delay resulted from the State’s gross negligence and the delay was prejudicial to Inzunza.
Gonzalez, Christopher, "Nevada v. Inzunza, 135 Nev. Adv. Op. 69 (Dec. 26, 2019)" (2020). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1277.