Venetian Casino v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Sekera), 136 Nev. Adv. Op. 26 (May 14, 2020)

Authors

Brendon N. Brandão

Document Type

Case Summary

Publication Date

5-14-2020

Case Synopsis

The Nevada Court of Appeals determined that the recent amendments to the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure require district courts to consider proportionality in addition to relevancy when determining the scope of discovery under NRCP 26(b)(1). The Court also provided a framework for district courts to use when determining whether a protective order should be issued for good cause under NRCP 26(c)(1).

Recommended Citation

Brandão, Brendon N., "Venetian Casino v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Sekera), 136 Nev. Adv. Op. 26 (May 14, 2020)" (2020). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1315.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1315