Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
9-2020
Case Synopsis
The District Court did not err by dismissing Yount's claims for contractual damages. The Court held that Yount failed to prove damages because he received a benefit that was not functionally different than the benefit he sought. But because Yount did not provide express or implied consent to introduce post-pleading counterclaims, the district court abused its discretion when it awarded damages for those claims sua sponte.
Recommended Citation
Phipps, Cristina, "Yount v. Criswell Radovan, LLC, 136 Nev. Adv. Op. 47 (July 30, 2020)" (2020). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1330.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1330
COinS