Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
9-2020
Case Synopsis
Expert witnesses may proffer testimony that embraces ultimate issues (such as a defendant’s mental state when he or she has entered a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity plea). However, such testimony must be otherwise admissible and not stray from opinions about factual matters to conclusions about the appropriate verdict.
Recommended Citation
Nelson, Joshua, "Pundyk v. State, 136 Nev. Adv. Op. 43 (July 16, 2020)" (2020). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1334.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1334
COinS