Brady Bathke

Document Type

Case Summary

Publication Date

3-2021

Case Synopsis

The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court properly applied Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statutes. The Court held that the district court appropriately granted the motion to dismiss because, under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statute, the defendants satisfied the statute’s first and second prongs. The Court also held that under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statute, the defendants were properly awarded attorney fees and costs, and an additional $10,000 for prevailing on an anti-SLAPP special motion to dismiss.

Download

Share

COinS