Authors

Julia Standish

Document Type

Case Summary

Publication Date

7-1-2021

Case Synopsis

In an opinion drafted by Chief Justice Hardesty, the Nevada Supreme Court considered whether a certificate under NRS 159.044(2)(i)(1) needs to be based on an in-person examination of the proposed protected person. The Court concluded that although a certificate is required for the district court to consider the petition, the certificate does not need to be based on an in-person examination of the proposed protected person. Additionally, it is within the sound discretion of the district court to decide whether the petition and certificate warrant the need for a guardianship or further proceedings, such as ordering discovery or holding an evidentiary hearing.

Share

COinS