Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
1-27-2023
Case Synopsis
Judge Stiglich issued the opinion. The issue was of first impression and asked if under NRCP 60(b) a District court could set aside a judgment, confirming a court-annexed arbitration award.2 This would go against Nevada Arbitration Rule (NAR) 19(C) limiting post-judgment relief only to that which corrects clerical mistakes and errors.3 The court held NAR 19(C) prevents a district court from granting post -judgment relief under NRCP 60(b) in the form of setting aside a judgment confirming an arbitration award. Thus, the court remanded and reversed the district court’s judgment and gave instructions to reinstate the arbitration award.
Recommended Citation
Coronel, Joe, "Arce v. Sanchez, 138 Nev. Adv. Op. 83 (Dec. 22, 2022)" (2023). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1552.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1552