Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
2-2024
Case Synopsis
The proper admission of other act evidence must be reviewed through the Petrocelli test and NRS 48.045(2), emphasizing the differentiation between Franks and Petrocelli analyses. Moreover, to challenge an expert’s qualifications, a full Hallmark analysis is required. In this case, despite some minor procedural errors, the State’s overwhelming evidence supported Bryce Dickey’s conviction for murder and sexual assault, thereby affirming district court’s judgment.
Recommended Citation
Jung, Sydney, "Dickey v. The State of Nevada, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. 2 (Jan. 4, 2024)" (2024). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1632.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1632