Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
1-30-2025
Case Synopsis
When determining whether to grant a motion to close a family court proceeding, a court must consider the factors in Falconi to properly weigh closing the proceeding against the public’s right to access the court. The Nevada Supreme Court reaffirmed the holding in Falconi that “while the public has a presumptive right to access legal proceedings . . . a hearing nevertheless may be closed when a party demonstrates that privacy interests outweigh the public’s right to court access.”
Recommended Citation
Brady, Vanessa M., "Nester v. Dist. Court (Gamble), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. 4 (Jan. 30, 2025)" (2025). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1745.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1745
COinS
