Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
Summer 2025
Case Synopsis
A GOVERNMENT AGENT IS CONSIDERED A PRIVATE PARTY IN CONTRACT DISPUTES, A JUDGE DETERMINES QUESTIONS OF LAW, THE COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING DOES NOT APPLY TO ACTIONS THAT COMPLY WITH A CONTRACT, ONLY A PERMIT HOLDER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW BENEFICAL USE OF PUBLIC WATER, UNAMBIGOUS CONTRACT PROVISIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, A JUDGE CANNOT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THEIR OWN FACTS, ATTORNEY COMMENTS SHOULD NOT BE IRRELEVANT AND INFLAMMATORY, AND TIME LIMITS CANNOT BE ARBITRARILY ENFORCED.
Recommended Citation
White, Cassandra, "Virgin Valley Water Dist. vs. Paradise Canyon, LLC, 141 Nev. Adv. Op. 19 (Apr. 24, 2025)" (2025). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1758.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1758
Included in
Civil Procedure Commons, Contracts Commons, Water Law Commons